特朗普要求美国最高法院推迟TikTok禁令以便在其就职后介入

美国总统当选人Donald Trump于周五请求美国最高法院推迟可能的TikTok禁令的生效日期，以便其新政府能够在此问题上寻求“政治解决方案”。

U.S. president-elect Donald Trump requested the Supreme Court on Friday to delay implementing a potential TikTok ban so that his administration can explore a “political resolution” to the matter.

此请求是在TikTok和Biden政府向法院提交相反意见的同时提出的。TikTok主张法院应废除可能在1月19日禁止该平台的法律，而政府则强调该法规对于消除国家安全风险是必要的。

The request coincided with TikTok and the Biden administration submitting opposing arguments to the court. TikTok urged the court to repeal a law that could ban the platform by January 19, while the government argued that the statute is essential for addressing national security risks.

Trump的意见书表示，他对该争议的核心问题不持立场，仅请求法院将TikTok资产剥离的截止日期从2025年1月19日推迟，以便审查案件的实质。该意见书由Trump挑选的律师D. John Sauer撰写。

In his brief, Trump stated he does not take a stance on the dispute's merits but respectfully requested the court delay the January 19, 2025, divestment deadline to allow further examination of the case. The brief was prepared by D. John Sauer, Trump’s pick for solicitor general.

这一提交是Trump在就职前插手国家事务的最新例子。作为总统当选人，他已开始与其他国家就关税计划谈判，并在本月早些时候介入联邦政府资金计划，要求拒绝两党方案并重新协商。

This filing marks Trump’s latest intervention in national matters before assuming office. The president-elect has been negotiating tariffs with other nations and earlier this month called for rejecting a bipartisan federal funding plan, prompting further negotiations.

Trump在其位于佛罗里达州的Mar-a-Lago俱乐部会见外国领导人和商界人士，包括上周与TikTok CEO Shou Chew的会面。他在竞选期间改变了对该应用的立场，从之前基于国家安全试图禁用，转而在2024年大选期间加入TikTok并用其吸引年轻选民。

Trump has been meeting with foreign leaders and business executives at Mar-a-Lago, including a meeting last week with TikTok CEO Shou Chew. During his campaign, he reversed his stance on TikTok, transitioning from attempting to ban it to using it to engage younger voters.

今年早些时候，Trump表示他仍认为TikTok存在国家安全风险，但他反对完全禁用。

Earlier this year, Trump reiterated his belief in the national security risks associated with TikTok but stated his opposition to banning the app outright.

周五的提交是在1月10日的口头辩论之前，辩论将审查该法律是否因要求TikTok与其中国母公司分离或面临禁令而违反第一修正案的言论自由条款。该法律由Biden总统于4月签署，在国会获得了广泛的两党支持。

Friday’s filings precede oral arguments on January 10 regarding whether the law mandating TikTok’s divestment from its China-based parent company violates First Amendment protections on free speech. The law was signed by President Biden in April with bipartisan backing.

本月早些时候，美国哥伦比亚特区巡回法院三名联邦法官一致维持了该法律的有效性，促使TikTok向最高法院提起上诉。

Earlier this month, a panel of three federal judges in the D.C. Circuit upheld the law, prompting TikTok to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Trump的意见书表明，他反对在此阶段禁用TikTok，并希望在其就职后通过政治手段解决相关问题。

Trump’s brief indicated his opposition to banning TikTok at this time, expressing a preference to address the matter politically once he assumes office.

TikTok及其母公司ByteDance的律师在周五的意见书中辩称，联邦上诉法院的裁定存在错误，并基于中国可能通过其外国附属公司施压控制TikTok美国平台的“假设风险”。

Attorneys for TikTok and ByteDance argued Friday that the federal appeals court's decision was flawed and based on speculative risks that China might exert control over TikTok's U.S. operations through foreign affiliates.

Biden政府则在法庭上表示，由于TikTok与ByteDance的关联以及其依赖于中国开发和维护的专有引擎，这种企业结构本身就构成了风险。

The Biden administration countered that TikTok’s integration with ByteDance and reliance on a proprietary engine developed in China inherently pose security risks.